Mass-Immigration Meme Spreads

Nearly a year ago, I posted: “Immigration Armageddon” and described the modern level of legal immigration as “mass immigration.” Since then, legal immigration has not become a political issue; illegal immigration is a big issue of course, but hardly anybody even mentions legal immigration.

Just recently, I was surprised to come across a couple of mentions of “mass immigration.” So, the meme is spreading. And my eyes almost popped out of my head when I saw the commercial below from Progressives for Immigration Reform on MSNBC. Their slogan:

“Tell our leaders to reduce mass-immigration until all Americans are back to work.”

That sounds like something Pat Buchanan would say, right? But this commercial is from a left-wing group. I am amazed by this outbreak of common sense because I’ve had a lot of conversations that go like this:

Green: “We must protect the environment from the sprawl.”
Me: “Yes, reducing immigration would be a great way to do that.”
Green: “Oh my god! We can’t do that! We’re a nation of immigrants!”

I once knew an artist who was photographing a rural county as it was being paved over. He was outraged at the housing developments being built. Yet he lived in one of those houses, and he was an immigrant. And many of the people moving into the new houses were also immigrants. When I pointed this out to him, he just stared at me. In his circle, mass-immigration was never questioned.

Of course, environmental impact isn’t the only consideration when trying to calibrate immigration levels. Mass-immigration has delivered a crushing blow to working-class Americans. In one of the conference videos on their website, Leah Durant, Executive Director of PFIR said that some of the wards of Washington D.C. have 40% unemployment rates. Do those areas need more people? I don’t think so.

As we speak, large numbers of middle-class Americans are being turned out of their jobs at IBM in favor of low-paid immigrant workers. The truth is that mass-immigration only benefits the oligarchs by reducing their payroll costs.

President Obama brought in 1 million legal immigrants per year during the Great Recession when unemployment was our biggest problem. That alone may cause him to be turned out of the White House.

Larry Kudlow is a Declinist

For some reason, at Monday night’s presidential debate, CNBC’s Larry Kudlow was carrying on about President Obama being a “declinist” – meaning somebody who accepts the USA’s declining power in the world.

At 4:25 into the video below, Kudlow says:

“There’s the Group of 20, and there’s the United States. Does Obama want us to be one of the Group of 20, or does he want us the be the #1 world leader in economy, military, foreign policy, democracy?”

However, Kudlow is a hard-core globalist and approves of the USA’s membership in the World Trade Organization. And guess what? We only get one vote in the WTO, and we don’t have veto-power like we do on the United Nations Security Council.

In Kudlow’s pet WTO, we are only 1 of 157.

And it is our membership in the WTO that is stripping us of our superpower status.

Note to Kudlow: We most certainly are in decline, and you and your globalist pals are responsible.

What is Colob?

I heard people talking about what sounded like “colob.” But when I googled it, a bunch of weird stuff came up. Turns out that the proper spelling is “Kolob” and Kolob is a Mormon star or planet; they don’t seem to be agreed upon which.

Since there is a Mormon running for president, Mitt Romney, I’m guessing that there will be quite a few people typing “What is Colob?” into Google. And if you just did that, try it again with a “K” or just go straight to the Wikipedia Kolob page.

Mitt Romney is a Redistributionist

After Romney’s infamous “47%” video came out, the Republicans responded with the Obama “redistributionist” video. However, there are more ways to redistribute income than just the tax code. And one of those ways is globalization.

Think of a plant before Romney sends it to China. The American workers there are receiving income. After the plant is moved to China, a small sliver of that income is redistributed to the Chinese workers. And the bulk of it is redistributed straight into Romney’s Cayman Islands account.

This form of “inverse redistribution” is what globalization is all about.

Note to democrats: if you support globalization, you are helping to build the oligarchy.

IBM – A Threat to American Sovereignty?

In a post discussing IBM’s cavalier attitude toward US immigration law, Robert X. Cringely wrote:

“IBM has no fear of the U.S. legal system.”

To that, I would add that multinationals also do not respect the laws of mere nation-states like the USA. They look at our laws as the result of hayseed provincials who just don’t understand the global economy, and how “god’s work” is really done.

Consider this quote from “Private Empire: ExxonMobil and American Power” by Steve Coll:

“Exxon’s far-flung interests were at times distinct from Washington’s. Lee Raymond would manage Exxon’s global position after 1989 as a confident sovereign, a peer of the White House’s rotating occupants. Raymond aligned Exxon with America, but he was not always in sync; he was more akin to the president of France or the chancellor of Germany. He did not manage the corporation as a subordinate instrument of American foreign policy; his was a private empire.”

Questions to ponder:

1) If IBM is a sovereign power, and it is stripping the USA of middle-class jobs, do you consider it to be a friendly power, or an enemy power?

2) Do you think it is wise to allow multinationals to grow more powerful than the federal government? To the point where they no longer feel the need to obey US law?

Nailed It: No Sweatshops in Steve Jobs Biography

Back here, I castigated Walter Isaacson for writing an entire book about Steve Jobs without even mentioning the giant gulag of brutal Asian sweatshops that make Apple’s products.

That was in December 2011. What happened next?


That’s what.

A month later, performance artist Mike Daisey’s “embellished” account of Foxconn caused a huge wave of sweatshop stories in the reluctant corporate media.

At a stroke, a decade of carefully crafted multinational propaganda was swept away. Today, everybody knows about the sweatshops. In fact, it is so mainstream now that even Saturday Night Live did a bit on it:

But don’t expect any multinationals to voluntarily give up their sweatshops. The gulag is very tightly integrated with our economy. It is part of our flesh and blood now – sort of like slave plantations were in the Old South.

It took the Civil War to exercise slavery from the South, and I don’t expect it will be much easier to exorcise the sweatshop demon. Rather, I believe we will see the system expand. This year, we signed a “free trade” deal with Colombia. In China, unions are illegal. In Colombia, union organizers are assassinated. They practically hunt them for sport down there. And that makes Colombia an ideal site for sweatshops from the perspective of the multinationals because they can have their prized “clarity” on labor costs.

So, not only is it a “race to the bottom” on labor costs and working conditions. It is also a race to the bottom on brutality and murder. If the Chinese don’t massacre some Foxconn workers soon, and restore orderly production, they may lose business to Colombia.

Yes, it is that evil.

Debate Traffic Spike

During last night’s presidential debate, Mitt Romney briefly mentioned food stamps. At that moment, there were five people on my blog. Sixty seconds later, there were hundreds. Here is a snapshot of Google Real-Time Analytics (click to enlarge):

That spike was an order of magnitude larger than any spike I have ever noticed on my site. Imagine if Romney and Obama had actually discussed food stamps. Sixty seconds of that, and I would have had thousands of people.

However, this is very low-value traffic. People were just doing a quick fact check, and I only got a couple of ad-clicks. So, the whole giant spike only generated a couple of dollars in revenue. But it was fun to watch.

How to Dethrone Pope Norquist

As Savage Austerity approaches, news networks are calling in the leading expert for consultation: Grover Norquist. He popped-up on CNBC this morning, and you will likely see a lot of him in the coming weeks as the knives are sharpened.

But what I want to know is why do Republicans “bend the knee” to Grover Norquist? The man isn’t even a conservative, or a republican. Norquist is raging psycho libertarian anarchist. Here is what Norquist’s college buddy, and ex-con, Jack Abramoff wrote about him in his book “Capitol Punishment” (pages 10-11):

“…Grover was dedicated to politics. A libertarian who worked within the Republican Party to effect change…”


“We agreed on most things political, but I was a bit uneasy at first with his desire to reduce the federal government to a size where he could “drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.” Grover was so hostile to the federal state that he did not trust it even with the national defense, which he felt should be outsourced to private companies.”

That’s right; Norquist even made The Most Corrupt Man on Earth, Jack Abramoff, “uneasy.”

And not even Ayn Rand believed in privatizing the Department of Defense. Can you imagine our national defense in the hands of Enron? And we are already moving in that direction. While US troops have withdrawn from Iraq, we still operate a large Norquist-style mercenary force there.

Norquist has hypnotized the Republican rank-and-file into permitting the creation of an all-powerful oligarchy, which does indeed create jobs – sweatshop jobs in China.

So, these are talking points for Democrats to attack Norquist. But they can also be used by Republican activists who want to usurp Norquist. For example, such an activist could replace Norquist’s pledge with a new one: “I pledge not to raise the taxes of people making x dollars or less.” Where x is perhaps the top income level of the middle class.

OWS is kaput, but those people who rushed into the streets were awfully mad about something, right? Deposing Norquist is the best thing the Republican Party could do to get out in front of that something. I mean, running an oligarch for president is hardly a strategy to win hearts and minds, now is it? So, excommunicating Norquist would be a nice, compensatory gesture at this point.

How to Smash Public-Sector Unions

Back here, Rachel Maddow complained:

“Killing the unions is the strategy for turning Wisconsin red, not just for now, but for generations to come in an irreparable way. This is about partisan politics. It is about destroying Democrats’ chances of competing with Republicans.”

But is it really only the Republicans who are responsible?

How to smash public-sector unions:

Step 1 – Adopt “free trade” and allow global labor arbitrage to smash the larger private-sector unions.

Step 2 – As blue-collar workers are escorted from their position in the middle class, state & local tax revenue sags.

Step 3 – What remains of the middle class must now decide to accept higher taxes to compensate, or slash the public-sector unions to cut costs.

Step 4 – The ground is now prepared to bring in the Scott Walker and Chris Christie types to save the day by heroically breaking the unions that are draining the public treasuries.

Of course, we would not have globalization without bi-partisan support. Bill Clinton got the ball rolling with NAFTA and President Obama just did three more “free trade” deals with South Korea, Columbia, and Panama.

So, I say to you Democrats: enjoy Walker and Christie because they are your creations.

Bain’s Sensata End-Zone Dance

With Mitt Romney in a horse race with President Obama, you might think that Bain would throttle back the offshoring a bit. The last thing you would expect is for them to literally be sending American jobs to China at the same time that Romney is promising to get tough with China.

But that is exactly what they are doing to Illinois auto-parts maker, Sensata.

Keep in mind that these globalists are waging a scorched-earth campaign against American workers and unions. And Bain is sending a message to them: “Nothing will save you. We don’t even need Romney to be president to finish exterminating you.”

They are flexing. Doing an end-zone dance. Trash talking. Taunting. Flipping America the bird.

They read all the angry blog posts with a glass of champagne in hand, and have a good laugh. They call the butler over and say: “Look it these puny Americans, Jeeves! They are made of marshmallows! When we herd them into the sweatshops, they will DESERVE it!”

Federal Government Survival Guide

This might seem like a silly exercise at first glance, but with the Fiscal Cliff and Savage Austerity looming, I submit to you: Europe.

Sarkozy. Gone. Berlusconi. Gone. Papandreou. Gone. Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, almost gone.

Riots in London, Greece, Spain, Portugal.

Financial chaos, collapsed political parties, secessionist movements, Nazis.

Perhaps our government and major political parties will sail right through austerity and come out smelling like a rose. But with such a vast swath of our population living in poverty, let’s just say that I am a tad nervous about what might happen when the food-stamp money is cut off.

So Washington, here’s a few helpful hints to start winning the hearts and minds of Americans, and yes, such a campaign is necessary:

Austerity – forget about it. Political stability is one of the few remaining advantages that we have over most nations. When things go haywire overseas, US treasuries and the dollar are the safe havens. If we deliberately create instability, with our huge debt and deficit, we are playing with interest-rate fire. We can’t afford higher interest on our debt because we are too big to bail.

Fire Leon Panetta. How is Congress supposed to work on a budget when the SecDef is threatening them? Fire him and bring the Pentagon back under civilian control. Then cut its budget. Adopt the Swiss military philosophy.

Roll back the empire – it’s a giant money sink. Do some nation-building right here.

Give the people their jobs back. Seriously, just give them back. Bring home the maquiladoras. That’s a million jobs right there. Put a moratorium on legal immigration. That’s another million jobs. Cut off temporary work visas. Another million jobs. You can win the hearts of 3 million Americans just like that.

Put this guy in a Supermax prison:

Crack down hard federal employees that squander tax dollars. It doesn’t have to make a big financial difference. Taxpayers will eat it up with spoon. People love justice, you know. Hearts and minds. It could even be a hit TV show. A perp-walk in every episode! Actually, we might need a new prison to hold all of these skunks. Give the prison-guard jobs to veterans.

Those are just a few ideas. I have lots more, but it’s not really my job. After all, angry mobs with pitchforks aren’t going to be coming after me, now are they?

Of course, it is entirely possible that the austerity marching orders are coming down from a level above – above Congress, above the White House, above the Supreme Court, above the Constitution itself. Maybe the orders are coming from the Beijing/multinational axis of which the USA is merely a conquered province. If that is the case, then I can see the bind you are in.

But there is only one thing for it:

A second War of Independence.

And the first shot in that war will need to fired by the House Republicans. They must depose John “Beijing” Boehner. Then Congress can get busy leveling the playing field of international trade and bring some factories back home.

The Chinese hold over a trillion dollars worth of US treasury bonds, and they want them paid back in un-inflated dollars. I have no doubt that they, and the multinationals, will be more than happy to march us into their sweatshops to pay off the debt. Remember, there’s a sweatshop in your future.

Nevertheless, restore American sovereignty. It’s just the right thing to do.

The British Empire was a much tougher foe; they were actually able to land armies on our shores. The Chinese can’t do that. They can’t even capture tiny Taiwan, right on their doorstep!

The multinationals don’t want to pay their existing taxes, let alone any new ones imposed by a Grand Bargain in December. So, they will fight hard for austerity. And if you add their Cayman Islands stash to China’s foreign reserves, you can see that we are up against a foe with a several-trillion dollar war chest.

But we hold the trump card: the largest consumer market in the world. We can deflate the Beijing/Multinational axis with a simple tariff on their sweatshop-made imports.

I say we play that card while we still can – before all of our middle-class consumers are turned into rag-pickers.

Itinerary of the Apocalypse

November 6th – Presidential election. Even if Obama loses, he will still be in office for the Fiscal-Cliff negotiations. That’s why Democrats like Chris Matthews are freaking out over Obama’s flimsy debate performance: it looks like he can be rolled – right off the Fiscal Cliff.

December – Lame-duck session of Congress implements “Grand Bargain” to avoid the Fiscal Cliff. The Pentagon accepts only a token budget-cut because they have all the tanks, and Leon Panetta has publicly threatened Congress, so we know that he means business. The rich people and corporations don’t even get a token tax-raise because they own all the politicians, and it is forbidden by Pope Norquist. And so, the taxpayers bear the full brunt of austerity. Social Security, Medicare, food stamps, etc. get slashed.

January – The “Obama/Ryan” austerity riots begin. Our cities sport the fashionable “charred chic” look of downtown Athens.

Let’s hope that I’m wrong, but I believe that our knucklehead elites are playing with fire – yet again.

Note: Don’t forget that it was the 1994 lame-duck session of Congress where Republican Newt Gingrich teamed up with Democrat Bill Clinton to sell us down the GATT river.

Nailed It: OWS Out

During Occupy Wall Street, I wrote in “Occupy What Now?:”

“People have rushed into the streets. They are protesting like crazy. They are mad as hell. But if you ask them why, they say: “We’ll get back to you.”

I’m calling BS on this phony revolution.”

I would have written a lot more, buy my Democratic friends had such high hopes for OWS that I didn’t want to rain on their parade. Nevertheless, I totally nailed it. OWS might go down in history as the most politically ineffective movement in history.

Turns out, anarchists are bad leaders and organizers. Who knew, right?

Jay-Z is still baffled:

“What’s the thing on the wall, what are you fighting for? I’m not going to a park and picnic, I have no idea what to do, I don’t know what the fight is about. What do we want, do you know?”

Indeed Mr. Z, indeed.

The Seinfeldian “Revolution About Nothing” came to nothing. Sure, banking reform is needed, but we didn’t need OWS to tell us that, now did we?

OWS had the complete attention of the media for a long time. They had a real opportunity to get their message out. And they totally flubbed it. The only points they made while being mocked by Steven Colbert were about “process.” Building consensus, getting money out of politics, etc. Not exactly the stuff of revolution.

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Colbert Super PAC – Stephen Colbert Occupies Occupy Wall Street Pt. 1
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog Video Archive
The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Colbert Super PAC – Stephen Colbert Occupies Occupy Wall Street Pt. 2
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog Video Archive

New Food-Stamp Record: 46,681,833

A couple of days ago, I speculated that the USDA was holding back the food-stamp report until after the Presidential debate because it was another bad number. And I was right. Not only do we have a new record, but they released the report at 4:39pm on a Friday afternoon when nobody was looking.

In any case, it wasn’t such a bad report. Only 11,532 souls advanced to the brink of starvation in July (the latest reporting month.) Of course, since we were already at a record level, this tiny addition breaks the record again.

Now, you might be wondering: If the economy is creating jobs, why do the food-stamp rolls keep rising? And there are two big reasons:

Reason #1 – Mass immigration – We are not creating enough jobs to keep up with one million legal immigrants per year, in addition to regular population growth.

Reason #2 – Bad Jobs – A large percentage of newly-created jobs are low-paid, and many newly-hired people still qualify for food stamps. From HuffPo:

“Three-fifths of all jobs lost during the recession paid middle-income wages, while roughly three-fifths of new jobs created during the economic recovery pay low wages…”

Laid off as middle-class, hired back as working-class. The planned liquidation of the middle class is right on schedule.

See my updated food-stamp charts.

Mitt Romney vs Thomas Jefferson

Mitt Romney complained:

“There are 47 percent of the people…who pay no income tax.”

But in 1805, President Thomas Jefferson bragged about the same thing:

“…it may be the pleasure and pride of an American to ask, what farmer, what mechanic, what laborer, ever sees a tax-gatherer of the United States?”

How did Jefferson fund his government without taxing the little guy? Answer: with tariffs, which were primarily paid by rich people on imported luxuries.

Modern-day neocons would consider Jefferson a communist, and water-board him at Guantanamo for daring to tax the rich. Globalists would consider Jefferson a menacing protectionist who was lucky that his tariffs didn’t cause the world to explode.

But somehow, the world didn’t end. As a matter of fact, the USA grew to great-power status behind its high tariff-wall.

Where is the Food-Stamp Data?

The USDA usually releases their food-stamp data before the end of the month. At the time of this writing, their website says (at the bottom of the page) that it has not been updated since August 28th. They should have published the September update by now.

So, where is it? Has there been another increase in the rolls that needs to be hushed-up until after tonight’s presidential debate? I don’t know, but I do know that the number of food-stamp stories has died down recently. Is the media also trying to help the President? You would think that this story about there being 1.63 million non-citizens receiving food stamps would have gotten more play: Obama USDA Met 30 Times with Mexican Government to Promote Food-Stamp Use Among Mexican Immigrants.

If a memo has indeed gone out, then maybe the Obama campaign has internal polling showing that food-stamps are a bad issue for them. But it is an open question. Will Americans vote against Obama because of the appalling explosion of poverty in this country over the last 10 years? Or will they vote for Obama because he has been feeding them since Mitt Romney sent their jobs to China?

I think that the issue should favor Obama. After all, how many starving voters on food stamps would vote for Paul Ryan who has vowed to slash the program?

Note: Click here to see my food-stamp charts.

Yep, Still a Buffoon

In a column about China, Thomas L. Friedman wrote in the New York Times:

“To say China needs its own dream in no way excuses Americans or Europeans from redefining theirs. We all need to be rethinking how we sustain rising middle classes with rising incomes in a warming world, otherwise the convergence of warming, consuming and crowding will mean we grow ourselves to death.”

The man thinks that we have “rising middle classes” in the US and Europe, and that we are in danger of growing ourselves to death.

Can you imagine?

I wonder how many times that has ranked on Gallup’s “most important problem” poll. I’m guessing: never. Unless they called Friedman’s house.

“What do you think is the most important problem facing the country today?”
1) Unemployment
2) Economy
3) Federal Budget Deficit
4) Middle Class Growing Too Fast [Ha!]
5) Lack of Money

Everybody seems to agree that the American middle class is in deep trouble – except Friedman. And the guy included Europe! Has he seen Europe lately? You know, the land of perpetual austerity riots? Is there a “rising middle class” in Greece or Spain? And what about Italy where the people are going back to riding bicycles?

Friedman is worried that China’s middle class will grow too large. But can the parasite grow larger than the host? What will happen to China, India, and Mexico when the last good job is sucked out of the USA? Answer: they will crash and burn right along with us.

Friedman is a priest still preaching a discredited religion: globalism. He imagines himself a great prophet, spreading wealth all over the world. In reality, he is a fool preaching the modern equivalent that the world is flat, or that the Sun revolves around the Earth.

Perhaps the intellectuals who read the New York Times will stop lauding Friedman after the austerity riots begin here next year. Too bad it will take a disaster of that magnitude to see off this tired religion.