<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bear-Market Rally Parallel Continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trivisonno.com/bear-market-rally-parallel-continues/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trivisonno.com/bear-market-rally-parallel-continues</link>
	<description>The S&#38;P 500 Will Take Out the March Low Soon</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.trivisonno.com/bear-market-rally-parallel-continues#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 23:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trivisonno.com/?p=87#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Hi W T F,

I don't think most technicians would call that a double top because the market had been declining prior to the December peak. I would call the December peak a move back up to the top of the downtrend channel, and then the move up to the February peak a retracement that came in the form of a rising wedge. Do you see what I mean?

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi W T F,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think most technicians would call that a double top because the market had been declining prior to the December peak. I would call the December peak a move back up to the top of the downtrend channel, and then the move up to the February peak a retracement that came in the form of a rising wedge. Do you see what I mean?</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W T F</title>
		<link>http://www.trivisonno.com/bear-market-rally-parallel-continues#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>W T F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trivisonno.com/?p=87#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Matt, I think you are too early. If you look back in 2000, a double top occurred: the first top about 2000/12/11, the second about 2001/02/04. 

Conclusion: a small decline from here to another top in the coming weeks and then... look out below.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I think you are too early. If you look back in 2000, a double top occurred: the first top about 2000/12/11, the second about 2001/02/04. </p>
<p>Conclusion: a small decline from here to another top in the coming weeks and then&#8230; look out below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
