Do you still have your 1>3>5 scenario on radar? I’ll be watching the action at 735.46. Hopefully we violate it to the downside.

@5:58… that’s where I have us, too. Still on (3). I understand the evidence for (5), but some things are out of place for me to call it that. Like you, I’m at 4 of 3 of 5 of (3).

I don’t get the 2s, either. I wondered about it awhile back, but the time course is wrong, the scale is wrong, and 4s are a better fit for any number of reasons.

For me, doing waves on INDU and anything else thinly represented can be misleading.

A formula I wrote, stuck on one of my charts 8 trading days ago, and then forgot about got hit at today’s top, exactly. Man, I should review ALL of my charts. Even less sleep…. oh no!

bud, the stars may be below your feet. LOL

Btw, it will be our job to carry Mrs. George’s packages when she goes shopping on http://www.traveladventures.org/continents/northamerica/magnificentmile.shtml

Psst, don’t tell George, but i’m afraid of heights.

When watching some program about megastructures, i think they said a bldg like the Sears Towers sways about a foot at the top. And that’s where we’re going to lease our offices, George !! We may have to Shanghai K & Yerk & others.

In a way he made a memorial to the Twin Towers many years before the trajedy of 9/11.

I had dinner the day before Thanksgiving 1981 or 82 at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center#Windows_on_the_World_restaurant I asked our waiter if that was the Stature of Liberty that we were looking at. From our table it appeared to be about 4 inches high.