Apple’s Crappy Computers

Two months ago, I reported on The Apple Fanboi Rebellion. Those complaints were about Apple’s software and developer policies. But now, the complaints have extended to Apple’s horrible hardware. It turns out that there are no Macs that will work with the hot new Oculus Rift virtual-reality rig.

The Oculus Rift needs a high-end GPU, and Apple just doesn’t do that. Not even its top-of-the-line Mac Pro, for which they have the gall to charge $6,000. Apple is still top dog, but they have a lot of huge holes in their game that competitors can exploit. If the Oculus Rift is a hit, there will likely be lots of Mac users defecting to Windows.

Click here to see what Oculus founder Palmer Luckey had to say on the subject.

The Apple Fanboi Rebellion

I have been a critic of Apple for a long time, so I was amused when Mac and iOS developers started complaining about a year or so ago. At first, their complaints were furtive, perhaps worried about biting the hand that feeds. But they grew steadily, and today developers are letting Apple have it with both barrels. You know those huge guns that they have on battleships? Yeah, those kind of barrels.

As an example, go and listen to episode 155 of the Accidental Tech Podcast where you will hear scathing criticism from ace developer Marco Arment (Tumblr, Instapaper, Overcast). I don’t know if there was smoke coming out of his ears, but I wouldn’t be surprised.

Will this rebellion affect Apple’s stock price? I don’t know, but I think the door is wide open for competitors. If Elon Musk ever entertained the idea of making phones and computers, he could probably steal away a nice chunk of Apple’s developers.

Should You Use a RAD Tool for Your Software Project?

Twenty years ago, there was a mad rush where every company built a website. Today, every company wants to have a mobile app, and apps are a lot more complicated than websites. You can throw up a pretty nice website in a single day with WordPress, but developing an app takes much longer. Consequently, there are millions of civilians faced with the challenge of managing software-development projects – a daunting task, even for pros. See: “The Long, Dismal History of Software Project Failure.” And no one is immune. For example, Apple’s “Copeland” operating-system project is regarded as one of the largest failures in history (see this).

In this article I will explain some things about software-development tools that will hopefully make things a bit more clear for the non-professional. So, which tools should you use? Should you use what the platform vendor gives you? For example, that would be Apple’s Swift or Objective-C for iOS, and Google’s Java for Android. Or should you use a tool provided by a third party, of which there are many choices?

One of the problems with using the “official” tools is that they play second fiddle to the hardware. Once a hardware company invents a new computer, they must then write an operating system for it. So, the tools they develop to do that are naturally low-level, well suited for an engineer writing a display driver, for example. They aren’t optimized for you to write an accounting app for your small business.

Another problem is that hardware competitors don’t cooperate very well. Steve Jobs famously wanted to crush Android. However, just about everybody developing mobile apps wants them to work on both iOS and Android. And so, there is a huge void for third-party toolmakers to fill, and one of the big things that they bring to the table is “RAD” technology.

Rapid Application Development (RAD) is a style of building software that has reduced the failure-rate of projects. Associated with the methodology is a group of tools designed to speed development. In general, this speed is achieved by abstracting away the native development environment of the operating system, and replacing it with a streamlined model that requires less training, and increases programmer productivity.

Imagine the iPhone as a beautiful work of art sculpted by the geniuses at Apple. Then the RAD designer comes along and says: “I can fix that” takes out his chisel and starts banging away. As you might imagine, it’s an ambitious endeavor, and RAD designers are a special kind of genius.

RAD tools are often expensive, but they are able to command premium prices because they really do speed up development. RAD tools can’t do everything, but for a subset of use-cases, you would be crazy to use anything else. Many people also like to use RAD tools for personal productivity and hobbyist applications because the streamlined development tools let them achieve a “flow state” which is very enjoyable.

RAD tools are also pretty popular; you might have heard of some of them: Visual Basic, Delphi, HyperCard, FoxPro, REALbasic (now Xojo), Xamarin, etc.

Let’s take a look at the major features of RAD tools, and then we will be able to draw some conclusions about the kinds of projects for which they are appropriate.

The Programming Language

First of all, the RAD designer has to invent a new programming language. For example, Apple’s primary programming language in recent years has been Objective C, and here is what the traditional “Hello World” program looks like in that language:

int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) {
    @autoreleasepool {
        NSLog(@"Hello, World!");
    return 0;

By contrast, here is the same program coded with a RAD tool (Xojo):

MsgBox "Hello World!"

A little more accessible, right? So, the RAD programming language does a lot of the grunt work for you. This language is often referred to as a Forth Generation Language (4GL). As you probably know, computers run on binary code, zeros and ones. That’s the first generation language, but it’s rather laborious for us humans. So, we have something easier called assembly language, the second generation, but that’s still too laborious for most tasks. Consequently, most programming is done in third-generation languages like Objective-C and Java. The code in these languages is run through a thing called a compiler which translates the language into machine code that the CPU can understand.

The Framework

In addition to the language, the RAD designer must abstract the computer’s framework. What’s a framework? It’s the built-in software that makes it easier for programmers to build apps. For example, if you want to draw a circle on the screen, you don’t have to manually switch on the pixels in question. You can just call a thing that does that: DrawCircle(x,y,r,c) will draw the circle after you tell it where to start (x & y), how big to make it (r), and what color (c). A framework will contain thousands of such subroutines, and typically the RAD designer will only implement the most important ones, leaving aside the more esoteric.

The RAD designer is targeting “applications” programmers as opposed to “systems” programmers. The systems programmers are the engineers at the computer company who code all the system software: compilers, drivers, file systems, frameworks, etc. The applications programmers are the ones who buy the computer and then write an app to manage their company’s payroll.

Applications programmers generally don’t have to use the esoteric functions of their computers. So, that’s why a RAD designer can leave out those functions. But there are indeed high-performance apps like games that need low-level code to push the hardware to its limits. So, most RAD tools are not suited for such apps. However, as hardware gets more and more powerful, more and more applications can be handled by RAD tools.

The RAD framework also facilitates cross-platform development. For example, Microsoft and Apple have been rivals for decades, and while their frameworks do pretty much the same things, they are vastly different and require years of study by programmers. But you can cut that learning-curve in half by using a RAD tool that provides you with a single framework and then “cross compiles” for each platform.

The Compiler

Since the RAD designer invents his own language, he also needs to invent his own compiler. You don’t need to know a lot about compilers, but in general you want a RAD tool that compiles to 64-bit “native code” and uses the state-of-the-art LLVM compiler. Once a RAD tool adopts LLVM technology, you know that it will be able to support new hardware in the future in a timely fashion. For example, Xojo recently added support for new the Raspberry Pi 2, a windfall for Xojo developers.

The GUI Builder

Applications programming almost always involves a Graphical User Interface (GUI), so RAD tools always have a drag-and-drop GUI builder. In the old days, you could adjust the buttons, text fields, and lists on your screen by just dragging them to the right place. But with the modern proliferation of screen sizes, you want a GUI builder that can automatically reposition things. You also want one that uses “native controls” so that your GUI looks like all the other apps on your computer. For example, Java uses its own controls and consequently looks horrible on all computers. Just take a look at the thinkorswim trading platform. It’s a perfectly good program, but it’s jarring to both Mac and Windows users because of its crazy GUI. So, when you are selecting your RAD tool, take a look at the apps it builds on each platform it supports and make sure that they have a native look-and-feel appropriate to the platform. If you are developing an app for internal use, you may not care about this very much.

The Database Engine

Most applications need to store data, so most RAD tools have some sort of database facility. Relational databases have been the standard for many years, and these systems are often referred to as SQL, which is the language that you use to talk to them: Structured Query Language. In recent years, a database called SQLite has become popular, so if your RAD tool has that, you will be fine. Of course, your RAD designer needs to do a good job abstracting it like any other part of the system. If you will be working with big data, or enterprise clients, then you want your RAD tool to have database “drivers” that can connect to the major database-management systems like Oracle, SQL Server, Sybase, MySQL, etc.


As you may have noticed, the RAD designer’s job is a big one. And because he has to get his product to market in a reasonable amount of time, he will very likely leave some gaping holes behind. So, you want a RAD tool that is extendable, with some kind of plugin facility that allows you to plug the holes. For example, a long time ago, I developed a product for a startup company in Silicon Valley using the Omnis RAD tool. Omnis was up to the task and the project came out beautifully, but it took a ridiculous amount of time to import the data from the IT department. The Omnis database was adequate, but super slow at importing. However, Omnis had an extension system that allowed me to write an import routine in the “C” programming language that sped up the process a hundred-fold. If a RAD tool is not extendable, then you shouldn’t use it for anything more than hobbyist projects because it is only a matter of time before you hit a brick wall.


Speaking of Omnis…I had to stop using it in the mid 1990s when the Internet arrived to the masses. Omnis required that you purchase a serial number for each copy of your app that you made. Such a model is fine for in-house work, and B2B apps, but completely impossible for shareware. So, I switched to Visual Basic which had no “runtime” fees at all. I have also heard of a “free” cross-platform mobile RAD tool that makes apps for iOS and Android, which is only free until you upload your app to the App Store or the Play Store. Then you get a phone call from the RAD tool’s sales department demanding thousands of dollars. And they can enforce the demand because your app is integrated with their backend services, which means that they can switch off your app whenever they feel like it. So, if you are planning on selling your apps, make sure that you know all the licensing details of the RAD tool before you start building apps with it – especially if you will be selling your app to the public.


RAD tools also include another large, complex piece of software called an “Integrated Development Environment.” You don’t have to worry about the IDE too much if you are hiring a contractor. If you are a programmer, you definitely want to evaluate the capabilities of the IDE because it has such a large impact on your productivity. And if there is no debugger, then it’s not a RAD tool.

Technology State

Imagine that you are a RAD designer, and you have been slaving away for years on your awesome RAD tool, abstracting away Apple’s “Cocoa Touch” framework. You release your product to great fanfare, and then a few months later at “dub-dub” Apple announces that Cocoa Touch has been “deprecated” in favor of a new framework called Coconut. The crowd goes wild over the new hotness, but your heart sinks because you know that you will have to walk over the hot coals all over again, updating your framework to support Coconut, which will take years. And while you are doing that, all of your customers will be complaining that their apps look old-fashioned on Apple’s new Coconut-based devices. Not fun.

In the software world, things are always being “deprecated” which means that while they will continue to work, they will be done away with at some point in the future. So, you need to get busy and reprogram your stuff. For example, Google has deprecated the first version of its Chart API, and released a new API. As the shut-off date approached, I recoded all of the charts on my website. And just as I was getting ready to do the same to the charts in my BlubberPatrol Android app, Google announced that while the original chart API is still deprecated, they don’t plan to turn it off any time soon. So, BlubberPatrol still uses the old API, which I happen to like better than the new one. But if Google ever changes its mind, and turns it off, and I don’t happen to catch the announcement, I will have to scramble to release a new version. That happens. Just ask Rob Walling; he discusses such an incident at the beginning of this podcast.

In July 2012, Apple deprecated its “Carbon” framework in favor of the new “Cocoa” framework. Granted, a big change like this doesn’t happen very often, but change is coming faster and faster making life harder for RAD designers to keep up. In any case, when selecting a RAD tool, you want to choose one that can generate apps for the current frameworks, and is made by a company that has the staying power to keep up-to-date. You definitely want a tool that can produce Cocoa apps on the Mac and .NET apps on Windows. Android updates are much more frequent, so talk to the user community online or at local meetups and see if the RAD tool has a reputation for staying current.

Critical Framework Support

Before choosing a RAD tool, you should identify the major features of your app. For example, if you will be selling it to the public, how will you collect payment? Will your app do push notifications? Etcetera. Make a list of these features, and make sure that your RAD tool supports them, or if not, whether there are third-party plugins available. Because if you have to dive down and implement such things yourself, your productivity is going to get torpedoed.

So, When Should You Use a RAD Tool?

First of all, pretty much any kind of hobbyist app can be easily handled by a RAD tool. If you want to write an app to catalog your bug collection, you will get it done twice as fast as you would with a 3GL. RAD tools can also handle most data-centric apps. So, if you have a million different bugs in your collection, don’t give it a second thought. If your RAD tool uses a SQL database, it will be fine.

Personal productivity apps, such as a customized to-do list are suitable for RAD tools, as well as office productivity apps: accounting, payroll, customer database, etc.

RAD tools are often used at the enterprise level, for example to build front-ends to huge databases.

RAD tools can be used for some kinds of games. For example, here is an implementation of Flappy Bird written in Xojo.

RAD tools can even be used to write RAD tools. For example, Xojo is coded in Xojo. This is called “self hosting” and is pretty solid evidence that the tool can handle large, complex projects. Xojo can also build web apps.

Many apps sold to consumers are written with RAD tools, and the original incarnation of BitTorrent was written in Python, which is not strictly speaking a RAD tool, but you might call it a 3.5GL. BitTorrent has since been rewritten in C++, but that was only after it took over half the internet.

So, RAD tools are capable of handling large projects. However, as we discussed, RAD tools are ambitions programs and require a lot of time to develop. So, if you want to be first to market on a new platform, RAD tools are pretty much out of the question. If you want to be there on Day One with your dashboard app when the first AppleCar rolls off the assembly line in 2019, I suggest that you start learning Swift right now, or make the acquaintance of a Swift programmer to contract with once Apple releases the SDK (software development kit).

On the other hand, you can be there on Day One with a RAD tool when new APIs are released for existing platforms. For example, when WordPress releases its much-anticipated REST API, RAD developers just might be the first to market with client apps in many categories.

If you are trying to win design awards, you probably don’t want to use a RAD tool since it may not support the fancy things that you are trying to do. If you are making a game that pushes the hardware, you probably want to use a 3GL. If you are doing something very innovative then you probably want to use the platform vendor’s tools.

If you are developing a mobile app, and you want it to run on both iOS and Android you are faced with a choice: You can hire two programmers, one to write the iOS version in Objective-C or Swift, and another one to write the Android version in Java. Or you can hire one guy to do both apps in a RAD tool like Xamarin. Obviously, Xamarin is going to win a lot of these jobs because it can do them for half the price in half the time.

Why I Like to Use RAD Tools

Many “real” programmers wouldn’t be caught dead writing an app with a RAD tool. They think that RAD tools are for a lower tier of coders who just can’t handle real programming. Sort of like an automatic transition in a car for the “idiots” who don’t know how to shift their own gears. But even though I am a “real” programmer with a CS degree, I prefer to develop apps with RAD tools. Why? Because I like to get things done. I like to finish projects quickly, so that I can go onto the next challenge. If you have a lot of ideas, and you want to bring them to life, a RAD tool can help make it happen a lot faster. Thirty years ago, I began writing software with Omnis 3. Then, I switched to Visual Basic for many years, and for the past fifteen years, I have been using Xojo. I made a lot of money and had a lot of fun. RAD is good stuff.

Further Reading

Tech Rumblings: Twitter Clones

Twitter has angered a good number of software developers who make apps for their platforms. Twitter is cutting off the numerous “client” apps that sprang up around their API, thus rendering the investment in those apps worthless. Here’s a story: “Twitter to Devs: Don’t Make Twitter Clients… Or Else“.

Angry coders are contemplating rebellion by launching a Twitter rival. They are pinning their hopes on Can the rebellion succeed? I don’t know, but with tech superstars like Dave Winer involved, Twitter has cause for alarm. Mr. Winer is not working on a Twitter clone himself, but he is providing wisdom to those who are. From his blog: “If I were making a Twitter clone…“.

Twitter says that they are not going to do an IPO anytime soon. However, by killing off client apps, it seems obvious that they are wanting to monetize their service by corralling all the eyeballs. In any case, if the rebellion gains traction, and Twitter rushes an IPO to market, investors would want to evaluate whether or not Twitter is trying cash-out before it’s too late.

Tech Rumblings: Mac Sandboxing

Some Mac developers have pulled their apps out of the Mac App Store due to “sandboxing”. Apple wants to make their computers safer from malware, and sandboxing is one way to do that because it restricts apps from accessing the entire computer.

For example, web apps that run in your browser have always been sandboxed. A web app written in JavaScript is not allowed to rifle through your files and upload your info to a hacker site. Your browser won’t let it because it enforces sandboxing rules.

So now Apple wants to restrict the activities of all Mac apps. And that’s a big deal because many important apps were developed with the assumption that there would be no sandboxing, as had been the tradition since the beginning of personal computers.

Needless to say, this has angered many developers. Perhaps this is an opportunity for Microsoft, or other platforms, to poach some developers from Apple. If you want to follow developments, one way to do so is to listen to the “Core Intuition” podcast. The hosts are both Mac developers. Episode 52: “The Potential For More Confusion”, is a good place to start.

I don’t know if this will have any investment implications for Apple. However, dumbing down the Mac to make it stupid-proof for the masses will be, at least, irksome for people who are used to real computers.

The Windows 8 Roach Motel

You can install the Windows 8 Release Preview anytime you like, but you can never uninstall it. And then it will stop working, and you will be forced to buy the final version to “un-brick” your PC.

I don’t know if Microsoft will take the gold in the Corporate Evil Olympics, but they sure are giving a good account of themselves.

In any case, here is an excellent video of this Windows 8 thing:

Read Michael Mace’s excellent story: Fear and Loathing and Windows 8. This is an in-depth analysis, so set aside some time for it; you will want to read the whole thing.

One of the interesting things that you will learn is that those horrible “Dick and Jane” style “tiles” on the home screen are daggers aimed at web services such as Facebook, Google, and Yahoo.

My guess is that Windows 8 is going to flop – hard. However, just this morning, I got an email from somebody, and at the bottom it said: “Sent from my Windows 8 PC”. So, somebody likes it.

Or maybe his feet are just stuck on some sticky stuff…

Take Away the Circuses? Really?

In “bread and circuses” America, the bread comes in the form of food stamps, and the circuses are delivered by BitTorrent. When the Jobs Czar sends a pleb’s factory job to China to increase corporate profits, the pleb can’t afford to go to the movies anymore. But he is still diverted from joining OWS because he is now occupied (ha, ha) downloading movies.

Until July, that is.

Because in July, US ISPs will begin monitoring the content of your download traffic, and administering harsh penalties to infringers. See the CNET story here.

Could this possibly work out better than SOPA?

Personally, if I worked for an ISP, I would seriously be thinking of finding other employment. I don’t need to be lynched, right?

The CNET story also says that the White House supports this initiative. Can you imagine? Obama is already getting dinged by high gasoline prices, and he’s on-board with this? In an election year? Wow. Why not just turn the keys over to the Republicans right now and save that billion dollars in campaign spending?

Note: BitTorrent accounts for a huge chunk of internet traffic. Estimates range from 20-40%. And BitTorrent isn’t the only torrent program.

Note: I don’t know what all the ISPs are doing since they have been keeping things quiet. But it is possible that they are going along with this because they know that their users will just evade the system by using things like SSL and VPNs.

Microsoft Poised to Commit Suicide

Judging by the preview version just released, Windows 8 is going to be Microsoft Bob all over again: a train wreck.

In his review, Matthew Murray writes:

“Never — and I’m going to repeat this for additional emphasis, never – have I been as horrified by one of the company’s products as I am by this one.”

Me too. I can hardly believe Microsoft is doing this. They are slaughtering the cash cow. Maybe “Metro” is fine for tablets and phones. But on the desktop?


Only morons will upgrade to this, and certainly not any organizations.

I wouldn’t hold MSFT if you put a gun to my head.

Steve Jobs is a Pompous Ass

Gadget fashion designer Steve Jobs has once again lashed out at bloggers:

“I don’t want to see us descend into a nation of bloggers, myself. I think we need editorial more than ever right now.”

Jobs’ attitude is that if Corporate America is not paying you to express your opinion, then you should just shut the hell up.

Note to Jobs: piss off.

Jobs’ anti-internet attitude explains why Apple has been amazingly clueless during the rapid growth of the web. Where was Apple when browsers were invented? What about Linux? What about search engines? What about social networking?

Nowhere; that’s where.

Jobs just watched as huge companies came into being: Netscape, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, YouTube, eBay, PayPal, etc. Mr. Jobs wanted nothing to do with anything that might empower the little people.

It would be a cold day in hell before Jobs assigned his programmers to develop free blogging software like WordPress. But as successful as Apple is, has a higher Alexa rating, ranking 16th to’s 47th at the time of this writing. Any Apple programmer caught working on such a project would be re-assigned to a Foxconn sweatshop in China making iPads at suicidal speed for Chinese minimum wage, which is less than what convicts in the USA get paid to make license plates.

(Note: the preceding may not be a true fact. I do not have a fact-checker on staff, so I am forced to just make things up. Note to Steve Jobs: the preceding commentary was a joke.)

Jobs also stated:

“Any democracy depends upon a free, healthy press.”

Is that so Mr. Jobs? Then why was the Zapruder film locked up in a vault at Life Magazine for 12 years? President Kennedy was assassinated in 1963, and the American people were not permitted to see the film until 1975. How did that help our democracy? When the powers-that-be want to cover something up, Big Media is only too cheerful to help.

Not only is Steve Jobs pompous, but he has it exactly wrong. It’s critical that we have a counterweight to Big Media.

And so, the great man will now “save” The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal by figuring out a way for them to “get paid” for their content. Sort of ironic coming from a man whose iPod became wildly popular because it could play bootleg MP3 music files, is it not? And last I checked, newspapers have been getting paid for centuries.

Note to Steve Jobs: I dare you to disable MP3 capability in your music-playing devices so that artists can get paid more through iTunes. I double-dog dare you!