Siri as Big Sister

January 17th, 2012

Here is a clip from the January 16, 2012 episode of The Daily Show:

Ironic, no? Especially considering Apple’s legendary Superbowl commercial from 1984:

At the beginning of the above inspiring commercial, you hear Big Brother saying: “Pure ideology.” That’s doubly ironic because, make no mistake, today’s multinational corporations follow a rigid ideology: globalization. And like it or not, it is a fascist ideology. Globalists hold that decisions about what goods and workers may cross national borders should only be made by corporations, and not by the elected representatives of the people.

That’s fascist. Deal with it.

More White People on Food Stamps than Blacks

January 17th, 2012

Read it and weep Gingrich:

Note to lazy, shiftless white people: get a job losers!

Here is the link to the USDA report. Scroll down about half way through the PDF.

Also, see my food-stamp charts here.

Further reading: It was Gingrich who offshored all the jobs in the first place.

China Bites Off $375 Billion Chunk of US Economy

January 17th, 2012

Libertarian economist Walter Williams jumped for joy when a Federal Reserve Bank study found that imports from China amount to “only” 2.5% of US GDP. Finally! Some solid evidence that our libertarian open-borders policy wasn’t destroying America!

But should libertarians and other globalists really be breaking out the champagne? I don’t think so. While 2.5% of GDP sounds pretty small, remember that our GDP is rather gigantic at $15 trillion. So, the Chinese bite amounts to $375 billion.

What does that translate into jobs-wise? Hard to say, but let’s calculate a rough estimate. In 2010, Walmart’s US sales were $258 billion. So, we can say that China has bitten off about 1.5 Walmarts. And since Walmart has 1.4 million employees in the USA, we arrive at a rough estimate of 2.1 million jobs lost to Chinese imports.

That’s not small potatoes.

Do we have 2.1 million jobs to burn? Not hardly. Would President Obama like to have those 2.1 million jobs in his pocket as he seeks re-election? He sure would.

And of course, when I rant about China, I am only using it as an example of our larger policy of free-trade with low-wage nations. So, countries like Mexico and India would have to be added in. Not only that, but the Fed’s calculation doesn’t consider collateral damage.

What happens to local businesses when you pick up the 250,000-strong US shoe industry and move it China? Do we only lose 250,000 jobs? Of course not. Just imagine all the restaurants, dog-groomers, and accountants who no longer have those 250,000 shoemakers as customers. The Fed report did not consider that, but the truth is that imports of sweatshop goods and services have cost the USA several million jobs.

Is it a coincidence that strong US economic growth is a thing of the past, and rapid Chinese growth is now the standard?.

Is it a coincidence that “jobless recoveries” began shortly after the gates were thrown open to cheap imports?

Is it a coincidence that the number of Americans on food stamps has nearly tripled since China was admitted to the World Trade Organization?

I don’t think so.

People like to blame Alan Greenspan for keeping interest rates too low, blowing up the housing bubble, and destroying the financial system. But I hold that Greenspan kept his foot on the gas peddle too long because he was unknowingly trying to fight the massive tide of offshoring. The real root cause is the libertarian, free-trade dystopia that was constructed at the end of the last century.

When you look at a product stamped with “Made in China” on a Walmart shelf, you are really looking at the tombstone of an entire American industry. See this story for how China targets small American manufacturing companies. Ironically, if an American company fights back against the mafia-style tactics of the Chinese, they are attacked by American retailers too. You see, retailers want those cheap Chinese products on their shelves, and actively try to destroy American producers.

Of course, American exporters are selling to China. Back in the day, the globalists used to argue that those new exports would create enough new jobs to offset the jobs lost. But that has been completely debunked. Not even Larry Kudlow will make that argument now!

History will prove my view correct. Wait and see. The USA topped-out when we brought China into the WTO. Short of trade-reform, it’s all downhill from here.

Note: China was admitted to the WTO in December of 2001. However, nations like Mexico and India were admitted earlier. See the list here.

Note: The Fed study linked above was conducted in response to the charge that the Fed’s QE2 policy would create inflation in the USA. The Chinese peg the yuan to the dollar, so they had to print huge amounts of currency to maintain the peg. That caused inflation in China, and the prospect of it propagating to the USA via higher-priced imports. I’m not saying that the Fed’s study is flawed. However, it is important to consider the context. The study would likely have not been done if the Fed didn’t feel the need to justify QE2. So, they did have an axe to grind.

Note: I was a supporter of QE2, and took much delight in the squealing of the Chinese, and their globalist fifth column here in the USA.

Ambassador from China Gets a Beating

January 16th, 2012

The former ambassador to China, John Huntsman, who acted more like he was the ambassador from China was kicked out of the Republican presidential primary race today. Voters didn’t buy his “everything is cool with China” line of BS.

Good for them.

But that won’t stop Rick Perry and Rick Santorum from following in Huntsman’s footsteps. Both of those fools are saying that jobs haven’t moved to China because of cheap labor, but rather because of the heavy-handed regulations imposed by Democrats that have chased manufacturing out of the country.

Will that line of BS work any better than Huntsman’s BS? No, it won’t, and both Perry and Santorum know it. You see, that message is not aimed at voters. It is aimed at corporate donors. Translation: “Look at me! I’m protecting your massive sweatshop profits. I’m your boy. Send me money!”

When Americans spend their unemployment checks and food-stamp credits at Walmart, where everything on the shelves is stamped “Made in China”, they know what the problem is. And any politician that tries to convince them otherwise just looks like a damn fool.

Mitt Romney has the hardest line on China, and he is winning. Is that a coincidence? I don’t know, but if it were the decisive issue, the main-stream media would not inform you of the fact. The MSM works to cover up the true nature of globalization on behalf of the plutocracy.

President Obama has done nothing about China. As a matter of fact, he rubber-stamped even more Republican free-trade treaties. So, if offshoring jobs turns out to be a pivotal issue in November, Obama may be vulnerable. What could his defense possibly be? He had four years. He did nothing. He could attack Romney for offshoring jobs at Bain Capital, but that’s small potatoes compared to what has occurred on the national level – Obama’s beat.

Of course, Obama is already taking action with his “in-sourcing” initiative. But will it be too little, too late? After all, in November, everything at Walmart will still say “Made in China”.

CNBC Banned Words

January 14th, 2012

Yesterday’s shameless whitewashing of the Apple sweatshop story made plain what CNBC really is: an infomercial for multinationals.

Banned words:
Global labor arbitrage
Maquiladora
Sweatshop
Sweatshop wages
Project Lean
Saipan
Giant sucking sound
Offshoring
Record immigration
Food stamps

Sometimes these subjects are brought up by guests on CNBC. But then Larry Kudlow immediately begins to shout and changes the subject – just doing his job protecting the romanticized “Gone With the Wind” version of the global economy – putting a happy face on the destruction of the American middle class.

If you pay attention, you will see that whenever the subject of sweatshop wages comes up in the mainstream media, no actual wage numbers will be mentioned. For example, one of the staples of propaganda is the story that goes: “Oh my god! Oh my god! Wages have soared 20% in China! Companies are moving plants back to the USA!” But they never tell you that those wages have gone from $1 per hour to $1.20 per hour. Right? Because if they did that, then people like me would start doing some calculations. See this WSJ article as an example.

Keep up the good work CNBC! America will be in ruins any day now!