“We spent so much time and care on making sure everything, we felt, was a fair hit. We never, ever went into it being like, ‘We gotta protect Obama, we gotta make them [Republicans] look bad.'”
…but then she came clean:
“This election’s so ugly that it’s not quite business as usual.”
Thank you for your honesty, Tina. Now go back to portraying Hillary Clinton as a beautiful, fashionable, energetic, young woman. The exact opposite of reality. I’m sure that the Gerald-Ford style pratfalls are coming any minute now too.
Fey made her comments at a Producers Guild of America event yesterday morning. See this story.
You have probably heard Michael Moore’s famous “pro-Trump” speech by now.
Notice how Moore is just dripping with contempt for democracy. The comment about millionaires only getting one vote is Moore talking about himself, and how his vote can be cancelled out be a mere worker bee – and an unemployed worker-bee at that!
Moore is just overflowing with contempt for Joe Sixpack, who is refusing to fulfill his assigned role in the global economy. That is, to self-deport from the planet via White Plague suicide. Instead, Joe Sixpack has found a champion in Donald Trump, and is refusing to follow Micheal Moore, who is eating his heart out from jealousy. Literally, he is a very hungry man.
You may have also heard Moore complaining that the meaning of his speech was reversed by an unfair edit (see the full video below). But we might ask why all that was needed was to cut it early. A single edit reversed the entire meaning from an anti-Trump tirade, to a pro-Trump tirade. The answer is that Moore was accurately channeling the thought-process of Joe Sixpack.
Moore got it right. However, the alleged “Man of the People” chose to fight his people; his very own blue-collar Michiganders; to support the system that they hate. He went on to demand that the people take their “medicine” – the bitter pill of Hillary Clinton.
Ladies and Gentleman, I submit to you that Michael Moore *is* the establishment.
How is that possible? Easy. Left-wingers are every bit as globalist as the robber-barons. In order to suppress wages, the robber-barons move factories to other countries. The left then responds by expanding their unions to those same countries. Both groups become globalists. Then the robber-barons bribe the union leaders, and you have one big, happy global dictatorship.
Donald Trump has been criticized for wanting to take the nation back to the 1950s. But Michael Moore wants Joe Sixpack to follow him down the road to Venezuela. Like I said, Trump has the better vision.
Before a dog bites you, he snarls and barks first. Michael Moore’s left-wing snarling joins with the right-wing snarling that I wrote about in A Final Solution for Joe Sixpack. And the dog could start biting any minute now.
Plan A was to steal the election from the populists with traditional subterfuge, and it looks to be failing. I don’t know what Plan B is, but I am afraid to find out.
Note: Below is the full video of Michael Moore’s show, but don’t watch it all; it’s terrible. Michael Moore quit his day job, whatever that was, to be a stand-up comic. He needs better joke-writers. His infamous speech starts at the 00:21:00 mark:
Donald Trump’s largest problem might be that his message changes when his poll numbers improve. He becomes less populist and allows his inner robber-baron to come out. I discussed how his position on mass-immigration changed in my last post, and I have mentioned his scolding of Ohio and Pennsylvania before on the Right-to-Work issue. Well, he just did it again.
I think it was in his Geneva, Ohio rally where Trump told the crowd that he would stop plants from moving to Mexico, but he would not stop them from moving to other states. He didn’t say “Right-to-Work states” but, trust me, people in Ohio and Pennsylvania know exactly what he meant. Right-to-Work is a super contentious issue in the Midwest, and scolding the voters of those states on the subject during an election as downright moronic.
Trump preaches against NAFTA, but long before NAFTA, Right-to-Work was moving plants from the Rust Belt to the Sun Belt. As I wrote in the Choreographing the Exodus section of my first book, Right-to-Work is a policy of internal globalization:
“First there were state laws establishing the “Right to Work” which effectively banned unions in the south, and the industrial north’s factories moved to the sun-belt states. Then there was NAFTA, and the factories moved further south – clear out of the country – to Mexico. Then there was the “Uruguay Round” of GATT and a thousand Asian sweatshops bloomed. And finally, we brought China into the World Trade Organization in 2001, and the USA’s economic back was broken in a massive tsunami of offshoring.”
Martin Luther King preached against Right-to-Work because it lowers wages. So, when Trump scolds Ohio and Pennsylvania for not adopting Right-to-Work, he is demanding that they take a pay cut.
At the New Hampshire and Maine rallies today, Donald Trump careened wildly off-script on a critical subject: mass-immigration. Trump has been saying that he will build a wall with a big beautiful door in it because we want people to come in legally.
But today, he expanded that language, saying that he would increase legal immigration. He said that there was a terrible backlog, and that he will make the process more efficient so that even more immigrants could come in.
The crowd DID NOT applaud. In Maine, where there were people behind Trump, frowns could be seen.
To state the obvious, Americans have always hated mass-immigration. Even the immigrants hate it. If Joe Sixpack loses his oil-rig job to a legal Mexican instead of an illegal, how does that help him? He’s still out of a job. We have 43 million people on food stamps that need to put back to work first.
Now, I’m sure that Trump was probably just feeling magnanimous due to the FBI decision to re-open their investigation into HRC, but he can’t afford this kind of catastrophic mistake in such a close race.
Funny how the FBI got religion right after Trump regained the momentum in the polls. I wonder if any other public serpents will try to get out in front of the pitchforks. Trump could probably start issuing orders to the executive branch right now.
Donald Trump is going easy on Hillary. “Crooked” is such a mild nickname for her. By siding with Black Lives Matter, Hillary is actually running on a cop-killing platform. Not only is this evil, but it is a profoundly dumb political strategy. A recent Gallup survey showed that respect for police is at historic levels and increasing.
Hillz actually sent a memo to the National Fraternal Order of Police saying “please don’t endorse me.”
I’m trying to think of a dumber strategy, but am coming up blank. I suppose if she killed and ate a baby at a live press conference, that would be worse.
Trump needs to play up this angle. This is landslide material.
Hillary is not exactly what you would call a laugh riot. She is indeed a nasty woman. But you don’t have to take it from Donald Trump. In fact, you could argue that Trump was late to the nasty-party. It seems that everybody who knows Hillary thinks that she is nasty as hell: her Secret Service agents, Colin Powell, her campaign staff (via WikiLeaks), and Huma had to actually tell her to smile (via an ear-piece) during the debates. Hillz doesn’t know when to smile because her brain is broken. It’s like on Dexter where the serial-killer psychopath has to work at passing for human.
Ironically, in one of Saturday Night Live’s sketches, Kate McKinnon’s Hillary character says that anybody who doesn’t vote for her has a broken brain. Even less realistic than that, there is a scene where Hillz is dancing at a party with the cool kids because she doesn’t need to bother with campaigning any more.
The reason why I bring this up is because a few days after I pointed out some cool kids having fun at a Trump rally, Hillz started talking about the need to do something about the “fun deficit” in the election. She wants to have a national dance party; a dumb idea that she undoubtedly got from that SNL sketch. Let’s see; Step One: hire a contractor to run some Craig’s List ads and hire some actors to play cool kids at the party. Step Two: hold the party at a large university where left-wing professors can twist the arms of their students and force them to attend. Step Three: pay some SEIU workers $15 per hour to act like they are having fun…
You get the idea. You can’t manufacture fun like you can manufacture violent protestors.
But of course, there is no “fun deficit” in the election. However, there is indeed a “fun imbalance” because Trump supporters are having a blast. You can see it on the rally footage that is not permitted on your telescreen.
And there is even more irony: the first three syllables of the nasty woman’s name are the same as the word hilarious. Hillary/Hilarious, get it? How could somebody with such an hilarious name be so un-hilarious? Answer: this is what happens in a coronation; you get a crappy inbred candidate who can’t even laugh right.
Today, Carl Cameron, who is the chief political reporter on Fox News, “debunked” the gigantic crowds at Donald Trump rallies. Cameron said that every candidate gets big crowds near the end of an election. Mitt Romney did, Barack Hussein Obama did. So, what’s the big deal if Trump gets some big crowds too?
Well, obviously, the big deal is that Trump’s crowds are 5x-10x bigger than Hillary’s. And Trump doesn’t have to rely on co-stars like Hillz did at Ohio State. Romney drew a big crowd in 2012 with Trace Adkins as co-star, and John Kerry drew a massive crowd in 2004 with Bill Clinton’s help. Trump doesn’t need that.
Consider this quote from Democratic strategist Johnathan Prince:
“When a big election gets close, every serious candidate can produce great crowds with the right notice and the right advance work. That was true for John McCain in 2008 – and John Edwards in the 2008 primaries, and we know what those crowds signified about results! Frankly, if you’re at all arguably serious to win and don’t have big crowds in the final weeks, your staff isn’t doing its job.”
If Prince is right, then the fact that Hillz can’t draw a crowd to save her life is a huge red flag.
What about that, Cameron?
If you haven’t seen guys like Cameron and Shep Smith working the Trump voter-suppression psyop on the allegedly Republican Fox News Channel, I recommend making an effort to do so. It is literally a propaganda showcase. You want to observe it now because it won’t be long before a Breitbart TV channel smashes Fox into little pieces. I imagine Trump allies like Sean Hannity will go over to the new network, and Trump haters like Cameron, Smith, and Megyn Kelly will go over to CNN or MSNBC, with large pay-cuts, of course.
In my previous post, I discussed how the media was conspiring to conceal the size of Trump’s crowds, but they could be seen on the internet courtesy of RSBN.tv. Well, guess what? During Trump’s two rallies yesterday in Florida, RSBN did not pan their camera around to show the crowds. The Tampa crowd sure sounded huge, but we couldn’t see it.
I didn’t see anything in their Twitter feed, but I’m thinking that somebody got to RSBN. When they pan the camera around, they inevitably shoot the other media crews on the platform. So, maybe one of them filed a lawsuit; perhaps a CNN employee. Or maybe HRC’s goons simply threatened to break their legs, or kidnapped one of their children. After all, Hillz seems hellbent on breaking all the laws.
In any case, we are back to there being a media blackout of Trump crowds. Why doesn’t the Trump campaign bring its own camera? The size of these crowds is a powerful message – perhaps the most-powerful of all. The fact that Trump has allowed them to be concealed might be his single worst campaign mistake. And it’s not like it’s rocket science either. All you need is a GoPro and a website called TrumpCrowds.com.
Update: RSBN was back to showing the crowds at Tuesday’s rallies. Whatever the problem was on Monday seems to have been cleared up.
The world’s dumbest billionaire, Mark Cuban, has been saying that Trump’s crowds are getting smaller. What’s especially dumb about this is that his candidate can’t even have rallies. HRC has “campaign events” which are more like book-signings at the Barnes & Noble. And not Harry Potter books either. She draws more like some obscure, pipe-smoking French intellectual.
But are Trump’s crowds really getting smaller? As far as I can tell, nobody has compiled any hard data on the subject. However, there is a good reason why your telescreen won’t pan their cameras around Trump’s crowds: they don’t want the Trump virus to spread.
But it is spreading. Like wildfire.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I submit to you that we are witnessing a full-blown mania.
Here is Trump castigating the media for not showing the crowd, which chants “CNN Sucks!” This footage isn’t from one of the Oligarchy’s telescreen cameras; it’s from RSB on the people’s internet. This was in Wilkes-Barre, PA on October 5th:
And here is a huge crowd at a former GM tank & bomber plant (the I-X Center) in Cleveland last night:
The Cleveland crowd might have been bigger than all of HRC’s crowds put together, not counting the staged affair at Ohio State where the HRC campaign tricked kids into showing up with a free performance from a popular DJ. And Ohio governor John Kasich wants none of the mania going on in his own party. Instead, he is working overtime to get TPP passed! World’s Dumbest Governor!
But the cool kids are still with Hillz, right? Maybe not. Here is a screen-capture from the Johnstown, PA rally on October 21st:
And here is a screen-capture from the October 22 Hillz rally in Pittsburgh:
Clearly, the party is at the Trump rallies.
The turbo-charging of Trump’s crowds may have been triggered by the recent exposure of HRC’s “protestor assembly line” where she mass-produced goons to attack innocent people and police officers at Trump rallies. Perhaps Trump fans are riled-up and thinking: “Hillz wants to rumble, huh? Fine. We’ll bring a million people. How many you got Hillary?”
In the future, the HRC campaign will be used in political-science textbooks as an example of what not to do.
Protestors disappeared from Trump rallies after Project Veritas released their videos. However, there was one protestor at the Cleveland rally last night. If this means that Hillz has hired a new goon squad to manufacture thugs, then she is even dumber than I think she is.
Here is another view of the Cleveland crowd:
YUGE Trump & Pence crowd in my hometown of Cleveland tonight. When I was a kid, fewer People than this would go to Cavaliers games. pic.twitter.com/WUR3MoRoWR
Since the criminal gang that was inciting violence at Trump rallies was exposed by Project Veritas, the protestors have disappeared. (You can go here to watch the last few rallies.)
DNC chaircriminal Donna Brazile has copped to “organizing protests” outside of Trump rallies, but heaven forfend, never, ever inside. As if inciting violence outside is fundamentally different. But the fact that the inside crimes have ceased is strong evidence that she is lying. Clearly, she should follow in the footsteps of Debbie Wassermann-Schultz. But who would succeed her? Is there anybody in the Clinton Mafia who isn’t tainted?
See Paul Horner’s story about how he was recruited by the Clinton Mafia, and paid $3500 for the “acting role” of protestor. Here’s a quote:
“Almost all of the people I was protesting with I had seen at my interview and training class. At the rally, talking with some of them, I learned they only paid Latinos $500, Muslims $600 and African Americans $750. I don’t think they were looking for any Asians. Women and children were paid half of what the men got and illegals received $300 across the board. I think I was paid more than the other protesters because I was white and had taken classes in street fighting and boxing a few years back.”
Donald Trump criticized President Obama’s telegraphed attack on Mosul for its lack of tactical surprise. And sure enough, ISIS had plenty of time to prepare a big surprise of their own: an attack on Kirkuk.
And President Obama has been bitch-slapped yet again; this time by NATO member Turkey who bombed our Kurdish allies in Aleppo. This has dampened the enthusiasm of the Kurds participating in the attack on Mosul.
The Mosul operation was designed as an October Surprise to cover the Democrats with military glory during the election. But now, US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter has had to rush to Baghdad to try and stave off disaster.
Will the American people really vote to continue this level of geopolitical incompetence?
The news media is describing HRC’s alleged criminal acts with words like: access, donations, quid-pro-quo, pay-to-play, etc.
This is a means of cloaking the stories such that the casual consumer of news is not alerted enough to realize *exactly* how corrupt she is. For example, if you say that the Algerian government made a donation to the Clinton foundation to gain access in order to pay-to-play, it sounds like they donated money to a good cause to get into a party where they played beer pong with the Clinton cabal.
No. They bribed her. Or she shook them down. If Algeria paid the Clintons to take them off of the terror-watch list, there was no play involved. Nobody was jumping around in a bouncy house, laughing like a deranged clown. Crimes were committed. Crimes that involve lengthy jail time.
Anybody saying access instead of bribery is part of the cover-up.
Yes, crooked polls with Democrat-stuffed samples are being used as a psyop against Trump supporters to try to suppress enthusiasm and turnout. (You can also think of it as large-scale jury tampering.) But such polls have an additional purpose.
Suppose that you are running for office and are planning to stuff the ballot boxes with phony votes such that you win by 10%. But all the polls show you running down 5%. So, you worry about people getting suspicious, and your opponent calling for a re-count and investigation.
What to do? Well, one thing that you could do is bribe some pollsters to show you being up 10%. So, when you win, it looks less suspicious. Even better, hire them before the election so that you can say that you have always been the front-runner and, of course you won by 10%.
Can you find such crooked pollsters? Sure, why not? When you consider how biased and unethical our so-called journalists are (as shown by WikiLeaks) how hard could it be to find some scumbag pollsters?
Perhaps Project Veritas could look into it? While that would be fun, it isn’t really needed since pollsters publish stats on their samples. They admit that they are doing it, and rely on the biased media not to point out that flaw in their “science.”
Scott Foval and Robert Creamer have resigned from their election-thieving jobs. But what if they could be arrested and made to talk?
They say they have been up to dirty tricks for decades, so one wonders exactly how many Democrats they have put into office under false pretenses. Would we see dozens of Democrat politicians being forced to resign?
During this campaign, we have learned that the entire Democratic party is one big criminal syndicate: The Clinton campaign, the DNC, the White House, the news media. If Foval and Creamer could be made to talk, we would find out where all the bodies are buried – literally.
And one also wonders if donors will want to be associated with a known criminal syndicate. It may turn out that the left has to dismantle the Democratic party, and start fresh with a new one that wouldn’t include the Clinton mafia.
However, they also ask another question: “Who do you think will win?” And while you might expect that question to also show a tie, it does not. In fact, it shows a huge lead for Clinton of 19 points:
How could there be such a huge divergence? Why would so many Trump supporters tell pollsters that they believe that Trump will lose? I think there is only one thing that could create such a massive effect: pervasive media propaganda.
With three weeks left in the race, the media has called the election for Hillary. Even the allegedly Republican Fox News is constantly blaring: Trump is way behind! The third debate is Trump’s last chance! Trump’s only hope is to blah, blah, blah. So, if you are a Trump supporter, and you turn on the TV (to any channel) you will be convinced that you are supporting a losing cause.
Using these two questions on the Los Angeles Times tracking poll, we might conclude that there are 19 points of bias in the media.
Doing vote-fraud with buses is just too obvious. A professional scumbag buys a fleet of used cars and has the “voters” drive themselves to the polls. You can hear HRC’s thugs explain it in episode 2 of the Rigging the Election series:
NBC has postponed an anti-Trump episode of Law & Order: SVU until after the election. See the story here. NBC made vague excuses, but perhaps they are having second thoughts about going through with what looks like a pre-planned attack on Trump scheduled months ago.
Why would NBC blink now? Perhaps they are unhappy with Saturday Night Live’sdrop in the ratings which may be related to their grossly biased depiction of Trump.
This is an important development because it indicates that Trump’s following may be much larger than commonly believed.